Sienkewicz Lectures on Roman Archaeology
“The Decline and Falls of the Roman
Material Economy or How to Trash Talk Rome”
Inaugural Sienkewicz Lecture in Roman Archaeology
Víctor Martínez, Lecturer in Art History, Arkansas State
University (vmmartinez001@gmail.com)
“The Significance
of Images in the Reign of Nerva, 96-98 CE” (Sienkewicz Lecture on
Roman Archaeology)
Nathan Elkins, Associate Professor of
Art History, Baylor University (Nathan_Elkins@baylor.edu) History remembers Nerva, who ruled from
AD 96 to 98, as the emperor who adopted the popular general, Trajan, as
his heir. Nerva’s adoption of Trajan added stability to his own
principate, as he was unpopular with the army. Nerva’s principate left
little in the way of public building and monumental art in view of his
short reign and thus there is little to assess the “self-representation”
of Nerva’s regime. The most complete record of state-sanctioned art from
Nerva’s reign is, however, the imperial coinage. But the coinage has
been studied with the biases of later historical sources in mind and is
commonly characterized as “hopeful” or “apologetic.” State-sanctioned
art did not operate this way; it always presented the emperor in a
positive light. A reinterpretation of Nerva’s imperial coinage is thus
in order and informs our understanding of political ideals and messages
disseminated during his reign. Close study of the imagery on Nerva’s
coinage suggests that those who formulated the iconography in the mint
walked in the same circles as prominent senators and equestrians who
associated with the emperor and who participated in the culture of
adulation. The study thus illuminates issues surrounding the selection
and formulation of Roman coin iconography and its relationship to
political rhetoric.
Where Did the Pompeians Go? Searching for Survivors from the
Eruption of Vesuvius, AD 79"
Steven Tuck, Professor of Classsics,
Miami University (tucksl@mamioh.edu) The goal of this project is to attempt
to determine whether people from Pompeii and Herculaneum survived the
eruption of Vesuvius in AD 79 and if so, whether survivors can be
located in the Roman world. Evidence that might indicate refugee
resettlement includes individuals whose movement is documented, Roman
family names, voting tribes, refugee intermarriage, new infrastructure,
and cultural evidence, Analysis of this material finds that the coastal
communities of Cumae, Naples, Puteoli, and Ostia provide the best
support for refugee resettlement. The patterns indicate that more people
survived from Pompeii than from Herculaneum, that most stayed in coastal
Campania, and that government intervention and support came after
resettlement, but did not drive it. Additionally, the refugees that can
be traced seem to have selected refuge cities based on personal factors
such as social and economic networks. |